No existing building is perfectly straight. Walls lean, ceilings sag, floors are uneven. Do these deformations also need to be represented in the 3D as-built model? Not necessarily. What matters is how the architect will use the model later.
3D laser scanning captures the actual geometry of a building with high precision. The point cloud shows the existing structure with all its particularities. In older buildings especially, it becomes clear how much building elements have changed their original shape over the years.
Modelling therefore raises an important question: should these deformations be represented faithfully, or is a straightened representation more useful for further planning? At VDE Villa Digital Engineering AG, we offer both. Which option fits depends on the requirements of the project.
In practice, we do not simply distinguish between "straight" and "deformed", but between three levels. They differ in how closely the geometry reflects reality and how easily the model can be edited later.
In straightened modelling, minor deviations are deliberately simplified, provided this complies with the agreed modelling standard. This does not mean the building was surveyed inaccurately. The actual geometry is fully captured in the point cloud; the simplification only takes place during modelling.
Straightening is therefore a deliberate modelling decision, not a measurement error. The major advantage: straightened elements can be easily edited with the standard tools of the respective CAD software. For ordinary conversions, this is often the most practical solution.
Many deformations are planar: a wall leans, but remains a flat surface. Such deviations can be represented realistically without leaving the parametric tools.
In ArchiCAD, for example, walls can be created as slanted or double-slanted walls. Since version 2021, Revit offers a cross-section parameter that allows walls to be defined as slanted. The elements remain editable, can be evaluated in schedules and tagged as usual.
This level combines realistic geometry with good editability. For many renovations and conversions of older buildings, it is the best compromise.
Not every deformation is planar. A historic rubble stone wall with a bulge, a twisted roof surface or sagging timber beams can only be represented to a limited extent with standard parametric elements. This is where freeform elements come in, such as the Morph tool in ArchiCAD.
These elements offer maximum geometric freedom, but do not have the same parametric properties as a regular wall element. Adding an opening later or changing the wall build-up is correspondingly more time-consuming.
For BIM projects, there is an important qualification: in ArchiCAD, a morph can be classified as a wall. The BIM information is therefore retained in the IFC export; only the parametric editability is lost. A model that is as true to reality as possible is not automatically the easiest one to edit.
An older building has a wall that is 3 cm out of plumb over its height. The point cloud captures this inclination. Depending on the level, a different model results.
All variants are based on the same survey. The difference lies solely in the modelling and in whether the inclination is needed for further planning.
This point is often overlooked when assessing as-built models. As standard, VDE guarantees an accuracy of ±2 cm for the geometry modelled according to the agreed standard, and ±1 cm by agreement.
If a wall is straightened within the agreed standard, its modelled geometry may deliberately deviate from the actual deformation. This does not contradict the accuracy guarantee; it is the result of a chosen modelling approach. That is why a clearly defined straightening threshold belongs in every modelling standard: up to what deviation is an element straightened, and from what point is it modelled as deformed?
Accuracy, modelling standard and permissible simplifications should therefore be defined before the project starts.
At VDE, choosing the modelling approach is a fixed part of the project clarification. We also take into account how easily the model can be edited later in the desired software. VDE models natively in ArchiCAD, Vectorworks, Revit and Allplan, among others.
If the analysis reveals deformations that would require freeform elements, we inform the architect about the impact on further editing. The decision is then made together. It is not VDE alone that determines how much a building is simplified, but the architect's requirements and the agreed standard.
Modern laser scanners capture the actual geometry of a building with high precision. How this geometry is represented in the model is a deliberate decision between realism and editability.
The best 3D as-built model is not the one that represents every deformation, but the one that best meets the requirements of further planning. The best solution often lies in the middle: realistic, but parametric.
Do you need a 3D as-built model for a conversion or renovation? VDE helps you choose the right modelling approach and creates your as-built model natively in the CAD software of your choice.